QuantumLearning Machines
QLM Credentials · secondary and post-secondary

CyberSim AI Systems Security

Defend an unfamiliar AI system, then demonstrate that you can safely supervise a bounded defensive agent without surrendering human judgment.

1

Practice direct and agent-assisted defense

Analyze controls yourself, then supervise a Blue Agent across evidence, authority, approval, action, and recovery.

Enter Blue Agent practice →
2

Prove C1-C4 twice

cybersim-form-3 draws eight unfamiliar task cases: two different case families per capability. Every decision requires cited records and declared confidence.

Open the foundation form →
3

Transfer C5

cybersim-form-3 pairs a full defensive-agent investigation with a second threat-family transfer case. Unsupported high confidence blocks the attempt.

Open the C5 capstone →
4

Pass independent review

C4 and C5 require two distinct faculty raters. Issuance remains blocked until all mappings under cybersim-map-3.0 are ratified.

What version 3 asserts

Five observed capabilities, ten task performances

C1

Classify trust boundaries and injection paths

Select the control and boundary that contain an untrusted instruction without discarding the legitimate task.

Two independently drawn server-scored cases

T1263 · S0712 · S0713 · OWASP LLM01:2025 · MITRE ATLAS AML.T0051

C2

Protect retrieval and output integrity

Apply provenance, corroboration, validation, or bounded execution at the boundary evidenced by the case.

Two independently drawn server-scored cases

T0309 · S0097 · S0667 · OWASP LLM04:2025 · OWASP LLM05:2025

C3

Constrain authority and protect sensitive data

Use least privilege, approval, and release controls so an AI system cannot exceed the task's authority.

Two independently drawn server-scored cases

T1030 · T1266 · S0097 · S0686 · OWASP LLM02:2025 · OWASP LLM06:2025

C4

Reconstruct and contain an AI security incident

Correlate records, identify the failed boundary, choose scoped containment, preserve evidence, and justify the response.

Two cases plus dual-rated faculty judgment

T1084 · T1119 · S0175 · S0641 · S0731 · NIST AI 600-1 · MITRE ATLAS AI Incident Techniques

C5

Supervise a defensive AI agent

Validate evidence-linked claims, constrain authority, approve or reject proportionate action, detect manipulation of the defender, and verify recovery.

Two cases plus dual-rated faculty judgment

T1046 · T1055 · S0641 · S0667 · S0719 · OWASP LLM06:2025 · OWASP Agentic AI Tool Misuse · NIST AI 600-1

Evidence integrity

Authenticated ownership, sealed variants, single-commit decisions, selected citations, confidence traces, hash-chained records, and replayable scoring.

Version continuity

Existing v1 and v2 artifacts remain valid under their original mappings. They are not relabeled as cybersim-map-3.0.

Claim boundary

Framework references describe alignment targets. They do not make CyberSim equivalent to workplace experience, certification, or licensure.